inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 vs Solar Pro 4
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens, while Solar Pro 4 offers a larger context window. Choose inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 or Solar Pro 4 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 | Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | SiliconFlow | Upstage |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.14 | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.57 | $0.60 |
| Context window | 131K | 524K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Sep 2025 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1361 | 1388 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1371 |
FAQ
Is inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 or Solar Pro 4 cheaper?
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.57 vs $0.60 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 or Solar Pro 4?
Solar Pro 4 has the larger context window (524K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.