Step-3 vs Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r
Step-3 is cheaper on output tokens, while Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r offers a larger context window. Choose Step-3 or Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Step-3 | Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NanoGPT | NanoGPT |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.25 | $2.50 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.65 | $2.50 |
| Context window | 66K | 128K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Apr 2025 |
FAQ
Is Step-3 or Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r cheaper?
Step-3 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.65 vs $2.50 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Step-3 or Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r?
Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r has the larger context window (128K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.