Claw Low vs GLM 4.6
Claw Low is cheaper on output tokens, while Claw Low offers a larger context window. Choose Claw Low or GLM 4.6 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Claw Low | GLM 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NanoGPT | Z.ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.55 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.10 | $2.20 |
| Context window | 1M | 205K |
| Parameters | — | 357B |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Released | May 2026 | Sep 2025 |
| LiveBench score | — | 54.7 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1440 |
| FrontierMath score | — | 3.8 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1341 |
| SWE-bench Verified score | — | 68.2 |
FAQ
Is Claw Low or GLM 4.6 cheaper?
Claw Low is cheaper on output tokens ($1.10 vs $2.20 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Claw Low or GLM 4.6?
Claw Low has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.