Phi 4 vs Llama 3.3 70B
Phi 4 is cheaper on output tokens, while Llama 3.3 70B offers a larger context window. Choose Phi 4 or Llama 3.3 70B based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Phi 4 | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Venice AI |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.07 | $0.70 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.14 | $2.80 |
| Context window | 16K | 128K |
| Parameters | — | 70B |
| Open weights | — | Yes |
| Released | — | Dec 2024 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1217 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 56.1 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 130 | 127 |
FAQ
Is Phi 4 or Llama 3.3 70B cheaper?
Phi 4 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.14 vs $2.80 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Phi 4 or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B has the larger context window (128K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.