Claude Opus 4.8 vs gpt-image-2
gpt-image-2 is cheaper on output tokens, while Claude Opus 4.8 offers a larger context window. Choose Claude Opus 4.8 or gpt-image-2 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.8 | gpt-image-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Input / 1M tokens | $5.00 | $8.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $25.00 | $8.00 |
| Context window | 1M | 0 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | No |
| Released | — | Apr 2026 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1461 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1556 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1294 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 91.0 | — |
| FrontierMath score | 47.2 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 159 | — |
FAQ
Is Claude Opus 4.8 or gpt-image-2 cheaper?
gpt-image-2 is cheaper on output tokens ($8.00 vs $25.00 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or gpt-image-2?
Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.