Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs GPT OSS 120B
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen3.8 Flash Next or GPT OSS 120B based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen3.8 Flash Next | GPT OSS 120B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | AMD | Neon |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.00 | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.00 | $0.60 |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Parameters | — | 117B |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Aug 2025 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1629 | — |
| LiveBench score | — | 46.4 |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 41.8 |
FAQ
Is Qwen3.8 Flash Next or GPT OSS 120B cheaper?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on output tokens ($0.00 vs $0.60 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3.8 Flash Next or GPT OSS 120B?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.