Qwen3.5 27B vs Claw Low
Claw Low is cheaper on output tokens, while Claw Low offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen3.5 27B or Claw Low based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen3.5 27B | Claw Low |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | NanoGPT |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.60 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.40 | $1.10 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| Released | Feb 2026 | May 2026 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1409 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1241 | — |
FAQ
Is Qwen3.5 27B or Claw Low cheaper?
Claw Low is cheaper on output tokens ($1.10 vs $2.40 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3.5 27B or Claw Low?
Claw Low has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.